<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Misclassification: Section 263 Invoked to Correct Staffing Income Mistaken as Software Export Income by Assessing Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56483</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - The income of the assessee from staffing, which was not an income from export of computer software was also allowed by the Assessing Officer without any application of mind and without any enquiry. Therefore, the Commissioner of Income Tax has rightly invoked the powers under Section 263 of the Act in the fact situation of the case. - Decided against assessee.C</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:11:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Misclassification: Section 263 Invoked to Correct Staffing Income Mistaken as Software Export Income by Assessing Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56483</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - The income of the assessee from staffing, which was not an income from export of computer software was also allowed by the Assessing Officer without any application of mind and without any enquiry. Therefore, the Commissioner of Income Tax has rightly invoked the powers under Section 263 of the Act in the fact situation of the case. - Decided against assessee.C</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:11:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>