<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1005 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and deleted the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the requirement for the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction regarding the correctness of the claim of no expenditure being incurred for earning exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1005 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and deleted the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the requirement for the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction regarding the correctness of the claim of no expenditure being incurred for earning exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>