<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 8 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24404</link>
    <description>The court held that the value of the assessee&#039;s share in the goodwill of the firm was includible in the assessee&#039;s wealth for the relevant assessment years. The annual payment of Rs. 50,000 was not considered an annuity exempt under the Wealth-tax Act. The court determined that the goodwill, being an asset generating income, should be included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 8 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24404</link>
      <description>The court held that the value of the assessee&#039;s share in the goodwill of the firm was includible in the assessee&#039;s wealth for the relevant assessment years. The annual payment of Rs. 50,000 was not considered an annuity exempt under the Wealth-tax Act. The court determined that the goodwill, being an asset generating income, should be included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>