https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293173 The Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana, rejected the application concerning the classification of GST rate for Mineral Mining Rights due to the applicant's non-appearance. The ruling underscores the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements and timelines in seeking advance rulings under the GST regime. The question regarding whether the Mineral Mining Rights should be subject to GST at 5% or 18% remains unresolved. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Mar 2025 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293173 The Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana, rejected the application concerning the classification of GST rate for Mineral Mining Rights due to the applicant's non-appearance. The ruling underscores the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements and timelines in seeking advance rulings under the GST regime. The question regarding whether the Mineral Mining Rights should be subject to GST at 5% or 18% remains unresolved. Case-Laws GST Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293173