<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 969 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403377</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petitioner to operate the Bank Account as the provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 had expired after one year from the order date. The Court directed the Bank to permit account operations, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines for provisional attachments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 969 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403377</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petitioner to operate the Bank Account as the provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 had expired after one year from the order date. The Court directed the Bank to permit account operations, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines for provisional attachments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>