https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403374 The allocation scheme for raw petroleum coke was construed to permit the DGFT to assess claimed production capacity on the materials before it, because earlier Supreme Court orders only fixed an outer import ceiling and did not determine unit-wise quota entitlement. The public notice was read as distinguishing between a State Pollution Control Board certificate evidencing capacity as on 09.10.2018 and the consent to operate, so the consent was not required to bear the same date as the capacity certificate. The allocation was also not shown to be invalid for want of application of mind, since the authority relied on the certificate and the certificate itself was not directly challenged. The challenge to the quota decision failed. en-us Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403374 The allocation scheme for raw petroleum coke was construed to permit the DGFT to assess claimed production capacity on the materials before it, because earlier Supreme Court orders only fixed an outer import ceiling and did not determine unit-wise quota entitlement. The public notice was read as distinguishing between a State Pollution Control Board certificate evidencing capacity as on 09.10.2018 and the consent to operate, so the consent was not required to bear the same date as the capacity certificate. The allocation was also not shown to be invalid for want of application of mind, since the authority relied on the certificate and the certificate itself was not directly challenged. The challenge to the quota decision failed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403374