<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1387 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293159</link>
    <description>Fundamental rights extend to speech, expression, and trade conducted through the Internet, so any restriction must satisfy reasonableness and proportionality under Article 19. Internet shutdown orders are lawful only if issued by the competent authority under the Suspension Rules, supported by recorded reasons, forwarded for review, and kept temporary with less restrictive alternatives considered; indefinite suspension is impermissible. Section 144 CrPC may be used preventively in urgent situations, but only on objective material, with a reasoned order, limited duration and area, and least intrusive measures. The text also states that orders curtailing rights should ordinarily be produced for judicial review, while no separate direct press violation was conclusively found on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2022 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1387 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293159</link>
      <description>Fundamental rights extend to speech, expression, and trade conducted through the Internet, so any restriction must satisfy reasonableness and proportionality under Article 19. Internet shutdown orders are lawful only if issued by the competent authority under the Suspension Rules, supported by recorded reasons, forwarded for review, and kept temporary with less restrictive alternatives considered; indefinite suspension is impermissible. Section 144 CrPC may be used preventively in urgent situations, but only on objective material, with a reasoned order, limited duration and area, and least intrusive measures. The text also states that orders curtailing rights should ordinarily be produced for judicial review, while no separate direct press violation was conclusively found on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>