https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293158 Statutory bail granted under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure stands on the same footing as bail under Chapter XXXIII, so its cancellation requires a fresh judicial determination under Section 437(5) on recognised grounds. The later filing of a challan, by itself, does not justify arrest or committal to custody, and prior rejection of bail applications on merits is not a relevant basis for cancellation after statutory release. On those principles, the cancellation order was unsustainable and the accused were entitled to remain on bail. en-us Mon, 03 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:06:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293158 Statutory bail granted under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure stands on the same footing as bail under Chapter XXXIII, so its cancellation requires a fresh judicial determination under Section 437(5) on recognised grounds. The later filing of a challan, by itself, does not justify arrest or committal to custody, and prior rejection of bail applications on merits is not a relevant basis for cancellation after statutory release. On those principles, the cancellation order was unsustainable and the accused were entitled to remain on bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293158