<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1422 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the objection regarding limitation, overruled the competency of the Power of Attorney holder, and found the default established by the financial creditor. Consequently, the application under section 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was admitted, and a moratorium was declared. The Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and the petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1422 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the objection regarding limitation, overruled the competency of the Power of Attorney holder, and found the default established by the financial creditor. Consequently, the application under section 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was admitted, and a moratorium was declared. The Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and the petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>