https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293145 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for restoration of the company's name in the Register of Companies. The shareholders successfully argued for restoration due to procedural irregularities, the company's continuous operation, and lack of show cause notice. Compliance requirements were outlined, including filing pending statutory returns and paying costs for negligence. The Registrar of Companies did not object to restoration, leading to the Tribunal's decision to restore the company's name subject to specified conditions such as filing overdue returns and paying costs to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs within the stipulated time frame. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:08:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293145 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for restoration of the company's name in the Register of Companies. The shareholders successfully argued for restoration due to procedural irregularities, the company's continuous operation, and lack of show cause notice. Compliance requirements were outlined, including filing pending statutory returns and paying costs for negligence. The Registrar of Companies did not object to restoration, leading to the Tribunal's decision to restore the company's name subject to specified conditions such as filing overdue returns and paying costs to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs within the stipulated time frame. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293145