<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1343 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293152</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declared Parts I-B and I-C of The Companies Act, 1956 unconstitutional but upheld the establishment of the National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013. The Court referred the constitutional validity of Chapter XXVII to a larger Bench for interpretation of constitutional provisions. The Petitioners were directed to submit additional documents for the larger Bench&#039;s review. Two Special Leave Petitions were listed separately for future consideration. The decision to refer the case to a larger Bench highlights the importance of resolving substantial questions of law and ensuring a thorough and just interpretation of the legal issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1343 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293152</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declared Parts I-B and I-C of The Companies Act, 1956 unconstitutional but upheld the establishment of the National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013. The Court referred the constitutional validity of Chapter XXVII to a larger Bench for interpretation of constitutional provisions. The Petitioners were directed to submit additional documents for the larger Bench&#039;s review. Two Special Leave Petitions were listed separately for future consideration. The decision to refer the case to a larger Bench highlights the importance of resolving substantial questions of law and ensuring a thorough and just interpretation of the legal issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>