<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 82 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24389</link>
    <description>HC held that annual value under section 23(1)(a) must be determined with reference to the sum for which the property might reasonably be let from year to year and the annual municipal (rateable) value. Following the Calcutta HC approach, the court answered against the Department and directed the Tribunal to re-determine the annual value of the properties in accordance with those principles and the directions set out in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 82 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24389</link>
      <description>HC held that annual value under section 23(1)(a) must be determined with reference to the sum for which the property might reasonably be let from year to year and the annual municipal (rateable) value. Following the Calcutta HC approach, the court answered against the Department and directed the Tribunal to re-determine the annual value of the properties in accordance with those principles and the directions set out in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>