https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24388 A reference under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act was held not to be maintainable where the same questions had already been decided by the High Court between the same parties. The pendency of a special leave petition before the Supreme Court did not, by itself, justify requiring the Tribunal to make a fresh reference on the same issue. The prior High Court decision remained the relevant determination for that stage, and the application for reference was rejected. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:25:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24388 A reference under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act was held not to be maintainable where the same questions had already been decided by the High Court between the same parties. The pendency of a special leave petition before the Supreme Court did not, by itself, justify requiring the Tribunal to make a fresh reference on the same issue. The prior High Court decision remained the relevant determination for that stage, and the application for reference was rejected. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Fri, 19 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24388