<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 917 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance under Section 43B and partially disallowed the interest on mobilization advance. However, it allowed the appeal concerning the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), granting the benefit of the second proviso to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 917 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance under Section 43B and partially disallowed the interest on mobilization advance. However, it allowed the appeal concerning the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), granting the benefit of the second proviso to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>