<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1903 (4) TMI 2 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293131</link>
    <description>The Privy Council held that the ikrarnama of June 21, 1883, effectively separated the family members, converting them into tenants in common. The document was deemed binding on the minors and no evidence suggested a reunion among the co-parceners. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the previous decrees were discharged, and the plaintiff&#039;s suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1903 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:16:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1903 (4) TMI 2 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293131</link>
      <description>The Privy Council held that the ikrarnama of June 21, 1883, effectively separated the family members, converting them into tenants in common. The document was deemed binding on the minors and no evidence suggested a reunion among the co-parceners. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the previous decrees were discharged, and the plaintiff&#039;s suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1903 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>