<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 911 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the inclusion of Jindal Intellicom Pvt. Ltd. and the exclusion of Ninestars Information Technologies Limited from the final list of comparable companies for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price for the assessment year 2013-14. The rejection of R. System International Limited as a comparable was upheld. The order was pronounced on January 19, 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:16:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 911 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the inclusion of Jindal Intellicom Pvt. Ltd. and the exclusion of Ninestars Information Technologies Limited from the final list of comparable companies for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price for the assessment year 2013-14. The rejection of R. System International Limited as a comparable was upheld. The order was pronounced on January 19, 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>