<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 910 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate the alternative ground raised by the assessee regarding the cost of construction, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution of the issues involved. The Tribunal refrained from addressing the primary issue of treating the debenture proceeds as business income, focusing on ensuring the completeness of the appellate process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 910 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate the alternative ground raised by the assessee regarding the cost of construction, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution of the issues involved. The Tribunal refrained from addressing the primary issue of treating the debenture proceeds as business income, focusing on ensuring the completeness of the appellate process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>