<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2010-11, contesting the reduction of income estimation from 4% to 0.15% by the Ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal relied on previous judgments for AYs 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2011-12, upholding the consistency of the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. As the impugned order was common for all three assessment years, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the reduction in income estimation for the assessee providing accommodation sales bills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:23:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2010-11, contesting the reduction of income estimation from 4% to 0.15% by the Ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal relied on previous judgments for AYs 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2011-12, upholding the consistency of the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. As the impugned order was common for all three assessment years, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the reduction in income estimation for the assessee providing accommodation sales bills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>