<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293116</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC discussed whether litigation should continue after the subject person&#039;s post-stroke condition remained static and the parties sought settlement and withdrawal. It treated the underlying cause as having effectively disappeared, held the pending suits and connected proceedings fit for disposal, and reserved liberty to revive only if a fresh cause of action arose or the condition materially changed. Exercising parens patriae jurisdiction, the Court approved a supervised care arrangement for the person&#039;s residence, care, and expenses, with joint decision-making by nominated family members and oversight by an Observer. It also placed the related company affairs under controlled management and directed disposal of ancillary proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:23:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293116</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC discussed whether litigation should continue after the subject person&#039;s post-stroke condition remained static and the parties sought settlement and withdrawal. It treated the underlying cause as having effectively disappeared, held the pending suits and connected proceedings fit for disposal, and reserved liberty to revive only if a fresh cause of action arose or the condition materially changed. Exercising parens patriae jurisdiction, the Court approved a supervised care arrangement for the person&#039;s residence, care, and expenses, with joint decision-making by nominated family members and oversight by an Observer. It also placed the related company affairs under controlled management and directed disposal of ancillary proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>