<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 895 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403303</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) held that threaded metal nuts, customized for the automobile industry, should be classified under Tariff Item 8708 99 00, rejecting the initial classification under 7318 16 00 by the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (MAAR). The AAAR emphasized that the nuts&#039; primary use in the automobile sector warranted their classification as parts and accessories of motor vehicles under 8708 99 00, in line with previous Supreme Court judgments on classification criteria. The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the MAAR&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 895 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403303</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) held that threaded metal nuts, customized for the automobile industry, should be classified under Tariff Item 8708 99 00, rejecting the initial classification under 7318 16 00 by the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (MAAR). The AAAR emphasized that the nuts&#039; primary use in the automobile sector warranted their classification as parts and accessories of motor vehicles under 8708 99 00, in line with previous Supreme Court judgments on classification criteria. The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the MAAR&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>