https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293103 Where a widow-landlord has already lawfully terminated a tenancy for personal cultivation under Section 31(1) and taken possession of the maximum land permitted under Section 31B(1), the statutory bar in Section 31C prevents further termination of the remaining land on the same ground. In that situation, Sections 31(3) and 32F do not govern the residue left with the tenant, so the postponed purchase regime is not triggered. Accordingly, no intimation of intention to purchase under Section 32F(1A) is required to be served on the successor-in-title, and failure to give such notice does not forfeit the tenant's rights in the remaining land. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:47:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293103 Where a widow-landlord has already lawfully terminated a tenancy for personal cultivation under Section 31(1) and taken possession of the maximum land permitted under Section 31B(1), the statutory bar in Section 31C prevents further termination of the remaining land on the same ground. In that situation, Sections 31(3) and 32F do not govern the residue left with the tenant, so the postponed purchase regime is not triggered. Accordingly, no intimation of intention to purchase under Section 32F(1A) is required to be served on the successor-in-title, and failure to give such notice does not forfeit the tenant's rights in the remaining land. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293103