https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403300 The Court addressed the Petitioner's request for a refund of &8377;10,79,676 and the issue of the petition's maintainability. The Petitioner had appealed to the first Appellate Authority under the CGST Act, but the appeal was unsuccessful. The Court noted the absence of a specific challenge against the Authority's order in the petition, raising concerns about its maintainability. The Petitioner's counsel acknowledged this deficiency and requested time to amend the petition. The Court granted an adjournment for the Petitioner to rectify the issue, emphasizing the importance of specific relief in the petition for proper maintainability. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403300 The Court addressed the Petitioner's request for a refund of &8377;10,79,676 and the issue of the petition's maintainability. The Petitioner had appealed to the first Appellate Authority under the CGST Act, but the appeal was unsuccessful. The Court noted the absence of a specific challenge against the Authority's order in the petition, raising concerns about its maintainability. The Petitioner's counsel acknowledged this deficiency and requested time to amend the petition. The Court granted an adjournment for the Petitioner to rectify the issue, emphasizing the importance of specific relief in the petition for proper maintainability. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403300