<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 878 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403286</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of losses by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). The losses of Rs. 1,81,26,485 were found to pertain solely to the demerged unit, not the Investment Division, as evidenced by the computation of income. The Tribunal concluded that the losses were not attributable to the Investment Division, allowing the carry forward of the entire loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 878 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403286</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of losses by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). The losses of Rs. 1,81,26,485 were found to pertain solely to the demerged unit, not the Investment Division, as evidenced by the computation of income. The Tribunal concluded that the losses were not attributable to the Investment Division, allowing the carry forward of the entire loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>