https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403261 Admitted issuance of the cheque, its dishonour for insufficiency of funds, and the accused's failure to reply to statutory notice established liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the concurrent findings of guilt required no interference in revision. The conviction was therefore upheld. On sentence, the Court held that six months' simple imprisonment was disproportionate on the facts and unsupported by adequate reasons, so the custodial term was reduced to three months while the fine and compensation were maintained, subject to payment within the time granted. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:29:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403261 Admitted issuance of the cheque, its dishonour for insufficiency of funds, and the accused's failure to reply to statutory notice established liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the concurrent findings of guilt required no interference in revision. The conviction was therefore upheld. On sentence, the Court held that six months' simple imprisonment was disproportionate on the facts and unsupported by adequate reasons, so the custodial term was reduced to three months while the fine and compensation were maintained, subject to payment within the time granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403261