<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 848 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403256</link>
    <description>Challenge to the amended refund restriction under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and the Uttar Pradesh GST Rules, 2017 was treated as requiring formal notice. Notice was issued to the Attorney General of India and the Advocate General of the State, counter affidavits were directed, rejoinder was permitted thereafter, and the matter was listed for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 848 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403256</link>
      <description>Challenge to the amended refund restriction under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and the Uttar Pradesh GST Rules, 2017 was treated as requiring formal notice. Notice was issued to the Attorney General of India and the Advocate General of the State, counter affidavits were directed, rejoinder was permitted thereafter, and the matter was listed for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>