<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was unsustainable due to the lack of a specific charge for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income in the penalty notice. Emphasizing the importance of clear charges in penalty proceedings, the Tribunal referred to relevant judicial pronouncements and set aside the penalty, directing the Assessing Officer to cancel it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:32:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was unsustainable due to the lack of a specific charge for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income in the penalty notice. Emphasizing the importance of clear charges in penalty proceedings, the Tribunal referred to relevant judicial pronouncements and set aside the penalty, directing the Assessing Officer to cancel it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>