<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 830 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to allow the deduction under section 35(2AB) for the Sipaigachhi unit, emphasizing that recognition of the R&amp;amp;D facility by DSIR is sufficient for claiming the deduction, regardless of the approval date. The case was remanded to the AO for verification of the actual expenditure incurred by the assessee for the Sipaigachhi R&amp;amp;D unit. The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 830 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to allow the deduction under section 35(2AB) for the Sipaigachhi unit, emphasizing that recognition of the R&amp;amp;D facility by DSIR is sufficient for claiming the deduction, regardless of the approval date. The case was remanded to the AO for verification of the actual expenditure incurred by the assessee for the Sipaigachhi R&amp;amp;D unit. The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>