<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 825 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403233</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal, granting the deduction for education cess and secondary &amp; higher education cess. The Tribunal aligned with the Bombay and Rajasthan High Courts&#039; interpretations, distinguishing &quot;cess&quot; from &quot;tax&quot; under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, thus clarifying its deductibility in computing business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 825 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403233</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal, granting the deduction for education cess and secondary &amp; higher education cess. The Tribunal aligned with the Bombay and Rajasthan High Courts&#039; interpretations, distinguishing &quot;cess&quot; from &quot;tax&quot; under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, thus clarifying its deductibility in computing business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>