https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403225 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the deactivation of the Director Identification Number (DIN) under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It directed the authorities to reactivate the DIN for use in other companies. The court emphasized the prospective application of Section 164(2) from 01.04.2014 and deemed the deactivation of DINs of directors of "struck off" companies as illegal. The list of disqualified directors published prematurely was declared invalid, and the condonation of delay scheme introduced was found irrelevant in justifying the deactivation. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403225 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the deactivation of the Director Identification Number (DIN) under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It directed the authorities to reactivate the DIN for use in other companies. The court emphasized the prospective application of Section 164(2) from 01.04.2014 and deemed the deactivation of DINs of directors of "struck off" companies as illegal. The list of disqualified directors published prematurely was declared invalid, and the condonation of delay scheme introduced was found irrelevant in justifying the deactivation. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403225