https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403224 Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act was treated as conferring broad protective jurisdiction on the Probate Court to preserve a deceased person's estate during a testamentary dispute, including interim directions through an administrator pendente lite. The Court also noted that no unanimity requirement governed the duly constituted administrators' committee, so majority decisions could bind participating parties where no express restriction existed. However, the Court held that coercive restraining orders could not be made against companies that were not parties to the probate proceeding, as the Court's jurisdiction did not extend to strangers without impleadment. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403224 Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act was treated as conferring broad protective jurisdiction on the Probate Court to preserve a deceased person's estate during a testamentary dispute, including interim directions through an administrator pendente lite. The Court also noted that no unanimity requirement governed the duly constituted administrators' committee, so majority decisions could bind participating parties where no express restriction existed. However, the Court held that coercive restraining orders could not be made against companies that were not parties to the probate proceeding, as the Court's jurisdiction did not extend to strangers without impleadment. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403224