https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403222 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for restoration of the company's name in the ROC register. Despite the appeal being filed under the wrong section of the Companies Act, the Tribunal treated it under the correct section due to misquoting by the appellant. The application, though time-barred, was conditionally allowed in light of the Covid-19 lockdown and extension of limitation periods. The company's name would be restored upon the appellant fulfilling specified conditions within the set timeframe, including filing overdue returns, publishing a notice, paying a set amount to the Central Government, settling dues with the Income Tax Department, and meeting all statutory requirements. Compliance with these conditions was crucial for the restoration of the company's name. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403222 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for restoration of the company's name in the ROC register. Despite the appeal being filed under the wrong section of the Companies Act, the Tribunal treated it under the correct section due to misquoting by the appellant. The application, though time-barred, was conditionally allowed in light of the Covid-19 lockdown and extension of limitation periods. The company's name would be restored upon the appellant fulfilling specified conditions within the set timeframe, including filing overdue returns, publishing a notice, paying a set amount to the Central Government, settling dues with the Income Tax Department, and meeting all statutory requirements. Compliance with these conditions was crucial for the restoration of the company's name. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403222