<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 808 - INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403216</link>
    <description>Regulation 7A of the Insolvency Professional Regulations bars acceptance or undertaking of a liquidation assignment after 31 December 2019 without a valid authorisation for assignment, and the authorisation regime operates with the eligibility conditions in the model bye-laws, including the age restriction for obtaining such authorisation. On the facts, the insolvency professional had given written consent for appointment as liquidator before the cut-off date and the consent had already been filed before the requirement became operative; the authority also accepted that a person above seventy years was ineligible to apply for authorisation. No contravention was made out and no direction was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 808 - INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403216</link>
      <description>Regulation 7A of the Insolvency Professional Regulations bars acceptance or undertaking of a liquidation assignment after 31 December 2019 without a valid authorisation for assignment, and the authorisation regime operates with the eligibility conditions in the model bye-laws, including the age restriction for obtaining such authorisation. On the facts, the insolvency professional had given written consent for appointment as liquidator before the cut-off date and the consent had already been filed before the requirement became operative; the authority also accepted that a person above seventy years was ineligible to apply for authorisation. No contravention was made out and no direction was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>