<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1172 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293074</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissed the appeal in a case involving violations of SEBI regulations related to manipulating securities prices. The appellant was found guilty of artificially inflating the price of a specific scrip through misleading trades, leading to a subsequent sharp decline. Despite the appellant&#039;s defense of trading based on improved company performance, the tribunal determined that the trades were manipulative and aimed at misleading investors. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to SEBI regulations to prevent fraudulent practices in the securities market, ultimately upholding the penalty for the appellant&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:59:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1172 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293074</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissed the appeal in a case involving violations of SEBI regulations related to manipulating securities prices. The appellant was found guilty of artificially inflating the price of a specific scrip through misleading trades, leading to a subsequent sharp decline. Despite the appellant&#039;s defense of trading based on improved company performance, the tribunal determined that the trades were manipulative and aimed at misleading investors. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to SEBI regulations to prevent fraudulent practices in the securities market, ultimately upholding the penalty for the appellant&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>