<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1419 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293078</link>
    <description>Fraudulent and unfair trade practice liability in securities markets may be inferred on a preponderance of probability from the totality of circumstances, including abnormal price movement, off-market transfers, related entity connections, and subsequent market trades; isolated reliance on low volumes or limited trading days was insufficient to displace the inference, so the finding of manipulation was sustained. A uniform four-year securities-market restraint was however found excessive where the noticees had differing roles and levels of participation, so the sanction was reduced for some appellants and replaced with a warning for one appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1419 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293078</link>
      <description>Fraudulent and unfair trade practice liability in securities markets may be inferred on a preponderance of probability from the totality of circumstances, including abnormal price movement, off-market transfers, related entity connections, and subsequent market trades; isolated reliance on low volumes or limited trading days was insufficient to displace the inference, so the finding of manipulation was sustained. A uniform four-year securities-market restraint was however found excessive where the noticees had differing roles and levels of participation, so the sanction was reduced for some appellants and replaced with a warning for one appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>