<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (8) TMI 23 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293072</link>
    <description>A partnership firm constituted under an instrument specifying the partners&#039; shares remained entitled to registration where one partner described himself as karta of a Hindu undivided family. The disruption of the coparcenary by partition affected only the internal rights of the family members inter se and did not alter the firm&#039;s contractual constitution or dissolve the partnership. The partition decree merely converted the family members&#039; interest in the partnership share into tenancy in common. On that basis, the firm satisfied the statutory requirements for registration, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (8) TMI 23 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293072</link>
      <description>A partnership firm constituted under an instrument specifying the partners&#039; shares remained entitled to registration where one partner described himself as karta of a Hindu undivided family. The disruption of the coparcenary by partition affected only the internal rights of the family members inter se and did not alter the firm&#039;s contractual constitution or dissolve the partnership. The partition decree merely converted the family members&#039; interest in the partnership share into tenancy in common. On that basis, the firm satisfied the statutory requirements for registration, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>