<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 785 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403193</link>
    <description>Depreciation on rented assets was held admissible where the Revenue failed to show any material difference from earlier years, and the Tribunal applied the settled principle that depreciation is allowable when the asset is used for the purpose of the assessee&#039;s business. As the factual matrix was identical to prior years and no distinguishing feature was shown, the disallowance was deleted and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:55:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 785 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403193</link>
      <description>Depreciation on rented assets was held admissible where the Revenue failed to show any material difference from earlier years, and the Tribunal applied the settled principle that depreciation is allowable when the asset is used for the purpose of the assessee&#039;s business. As the factual matrix was identical to prior years and no distinguishing feature was shown, the disallowance was deleted and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>