<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 767 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and reinstating the Original Authority&#039;s penalty of Rs. 20,000. It found the delays in document submission to be procedural, with no revenue impact or evidence of malafide intent, deeming the enhanced penalty of Rs. 4,00,000 unjustified. The judgment emphasized fair penalties for procedural lapses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 767 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and reinstating the Original Authority&#039;s penalty of Rs. 20,000. It found the delays in document submission to be procedural, with no revenue impact or evidence of malafide intent, deeming the enhanced penalty of Rs. 4,00,000 unjustified. The judgment emphasized fair penalties for procedural lapses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>