<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 764 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the application under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, allowing dispensation of meetings for shareholders and creditors to consider a Scheme of Arrangement. With consent from all stakeholders through affidavits and certificates, the Tribunal dispensed with the meetings, emphasizing stakeholder consent and legal compliance. The decision aimed to facilitate the companies in implementing the Scheme while upholding transparency and statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 764 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the application under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, allowing dispensation of meetings for shareholders and creditors to consider a Scheme of Arrangement. With consent from all stakeholders through affidavits and certificates, the Tribunal dispensed with the meetings, emphasizing stakeholder consent and legal compliance. The decision aimed to facilitate the companies in implementing the Scheme while upholding transparency and statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>