<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 839 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293061</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under the SEBI Act for violating FUTP Regulation. The appellant, found guilty of artificially propping up share prices through manipulative trades, had their penalty reduced from 2 lacs to 1 lac. Despite similarities with another case, the Tribunal considered the gravity of the offense and the number of trades in determining the reduced penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 839 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293061</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under the SEBI Act for violating FUTP Regulation. The appellant, found guilty of artificially propping up share prices through manipulative trades, had their penalty reduced from 2 lacs to 1 lac. Despite similarities with another case, the Tribunal considered the gravity of the offense and the number of trades in determining the reduced penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>