https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403131 The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the company's name struck off by the Registrar of Companies under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company was directed to fulfill specific requirements, including filing pending annual returns and balance sheets, depositing a specified sum, and submitting an affidavit of compliance. Shareholders were also required to provide an undertaking regarding account usage during demonetization. The order did not automatically reinstate disqualified directors and did not limit the RoC's authority to take action for non-compliance. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:53:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403131 The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the company's name struck off by the Registrar of Companies under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company was directed to fulfill specific requirements, including filing pending annual returns and balance sheets, depositing a specified sum, and submitting an affidavit of compliance. Shareholders were also required to provide an undertaking regarding account usage during demonetization. The order did not automatically reinstate disqualified directors and did not limit the RoC's authority to take action for non-compliance. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403131