<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 710 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalty regarding the removal of spent sulphuric acid under a specific notification. The decision was based on established judicial precedents and interpretations, concluding that no reversal of Cenvat Credit was required for the removal of such specific byproducts under the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:49:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 710 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalty regarding the removal of spent sulphuric acid under a specific notification. The decision was based on established judicial precedents and interpretations, concluding that no reversal of Cenvat Credit was required for the removal of such specific byproducts under the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>