<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 709 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403117</link>
    <description>For central excise valuation, freight charges for delivery of excisable goods from the factory to the buyer&#039;s premises are not includible in the assessable value. The analysis applies Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, and follows the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation that the buyer&#039;s premises cannot be treated as the place of removal. The place of removal is confined to the manufacturer&#039;s premises or another premises referable to the manufacturer from which the goods are sold, so transportation cost beyond that point is deductible. The demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 709 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403117</link>
      <description>For central excise valuation, freight charges for delivery of excisable goods from the factory to the buyer&#039;s premises are not includible in the assessable value. The analysis applies Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, and follows the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation that the buyer&#039;s premises cannot be treated as the place of removal. The place of removal is confined to the manufacturer&#039;s premises or another premises referable to the manufacturer from which the goods are sold, so transportation cost beyond that point is deductible. The demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>