https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403114 Recovery from a vehicle intercepted in transit is treated as seizure under Section 43 of the NDPS Act, not as a search governed by Section 42; therefore, the challenge based on alleged non-compliance with Section 42 was rejected, and prior communication of the information to the SHO by ruqa was treated as sufficient compliance in any event. Because the recovery involved commercial quantity of contraband, the restrictive bail framework under Section 37 applied, and in the absence of material showing reasonable grounds to believe the accused was not guilty or unlikely to reoffend, bail was denied. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:29:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403114 Recovery from a vehicle intercepted in transit is treated as seizure under Section 43 of the NDPS Act, not as a search governed by Section 42; therefore, the challenge based on alleged non-compliance with Section 42 was rejected, and prior communication of the information to the SHO by ruqa was treated as sufficient compliance in any event. Because the recovery involved commercial quantity of contraband, the restrictive bail framework under Section 37 applied, and in the absence of material showing reasonable grounds to believe the accused was not guilty or unlikely to reoffend, bail was denied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403114