<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1848 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293040</link>
    <description>Employees&#039; requests for impleadment, disclosure of resolution plan papers, and modification of the proposed plan to secure higher workmen&#039;s dues and continued employment were held not to warrant interference at the corporate insolvency resolution stage. The text notes that the employees&#039; grievances had already been considered by the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors, and that the resolution applicant had enhanced its offer for workmen&#039;s dues. It emphasises that decision-making under the insolvency framework lies principally with the Committee of Creditors, while the adjudicating authority may direct reconsideration only where necessary. As the claims had already been reconsidered within that framework, the application was found not maintainable, with only a sympathy-based observation regarding remaining grievances during implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1848 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293040</link>
      <description>Employees&#039; requests for impleadment, disclosure of resolution plan papers, and modification of the proposed plan to secure higher workmen&#039;s dues and continued employment were held not to warrant interference at the corporate insolvency resolution stage. The text notes that the employees&#039; grievances had already been considered by the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors, and that the resolution applicant had enhanced its offer for workmen&#039;s dues. It emphasises that decision-making under the insolvency framework lies principally with the Committee of Creditors, while the adjudicating authority may direct reconsideration only where necessary. As the claims had already been reconsidered within that framework, the application was found not maintainable, with only a sympathy-based observation regarding remaining grievances during implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>