<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2034 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68 for most shareholders as the assessee proved identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. However, the Tribunal remitted the issue of addition for specific entities back to the AO for fresh examination, emphasizing the proviso to Section 68 is not applicable for the assessment year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2034 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68 for most shareholders as the assessee proved identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. However, the Tribunal remitted the issue of addition for specific entities back to the AO for fresh examination, emphasizing the proviso to Section 68 is not applicable for the assessment year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>