<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1618 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, confirming that the assessee provided sufficient evidence to establish the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the shareholders. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the correctness of the CIT(A)&#039;s order, which was based on a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:26:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1618 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, confirming that the assessee provided sufficient evidence to establish the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the shareholders. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the correctness of the CIT(A)&#039;s order, which was based on a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>