https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293055 The Authority for Advance Ruling in Haryana rejected the applicant's request for clarification on the classification of foot/floor mats for motor vehicles made of Carpets and PVC Plastic due to the applicant's non-appearance and failure to seek an adjournment. This decision was made in accordance with the provisions of the CGST/HGST Act, which require rulings to be issued within 90 days of receiving the application, and failure to comply resulted in rejection under Section 98(2) of the Act. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:26:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293055 The Authority for Advance Ruling in Haryana rejected the applicant's request for clarification on the classification of foot/floor mats for motor vehicles made of Carpets and PVC Plastic due to the applicant's non-appearance and failure to seek an adjournment. This decision was made in accordance with the provisions of the CGST/HGST Act, which require rulings to be issued within 90 days of receiving the application, and failure to comply resulted in rejection under Section 98(2) of the Act. Case-Laws GST Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293055