https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293026 The Court held that disputed property in a Hindu undivided family was ancestral, rejecting the claim of exclusive ownership. It clarified that partition does not entail gifting and all sons are entitled to a share. Maintenance claims for daughters were addressed, with the Court directing funds from joint assets but denying post-suit daughter's claim on sons' share. The decree was modified to ensure proper provision for marriage expenses without burdening sons' share. The appeal was allowed, lower court decrees modified, costs awarded, and provisions adjusted for fairness and legal compliance. en-us Thu, 03 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:24:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293026 The Court held that disputed property in a Hindu undivided family was ancestral, rejecting the claim of exclusive ownership. It clarified that partition does not entail gifting and all sons are entitled to a share. Maintenance claims for daughters were addressed, with the Court directing funds from joint assets but denying post-suit daughter's claim on sons' share. The decree was modified to ensure proper provision for marriage expenses without burdening sons' share. The appeal was allowed, lower court decrees modified, costs awarded, and provisions adjusted for fairness and legal compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293026