https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293022 The court upheld the authority of the Enforcement Officer to retain custody of seized documents and currency notes for investigation purposes under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Despite a formal defect in the authorization letter issued by the Deputy Director, it was deemed valid for the seizure. The court emphasized the importance of facilitating ongoing investigations into suspected violations, dismissing challenges raised by the petitioners and affirming the Enforcement Officer's power to retain the seized documents. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293022 The court upheld the authority of the Enforcement Officer to retain custody of seized documents and currency notes for investigation purposes under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Despite a formal defect in the authorization letter issued by the Deputy Director, it was deemed valid for the seizure. The court emphasized the importance of facilitating ongoing investigations into suspected violations, dismissing challenges raised by the petitioners and affirming the Enforcement Officer's power to retain the seized documents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293022