<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 677 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition of entrance fees collected from non-members based on the principle of mutuality. However, the claims regarding surplus income over expenditure, interest income, and loss being expenditure over income were dismissed in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Bangalore Club v. CIT. The order was pronounced on January 6, 2021, at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:48:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 677 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition of entrance fees collected from non-members based on the principle of mutuality. However, the claims regarding surplus income over expenditure, interest income, and loss being expenditure over income were dismissed in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Bangalore Club v. CIT. The order was pronounced on January 6, 2021, at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>